PERSONALITY
What is Personality
v Constructing
a coherent picture of the individual and his or her major psychological
processes.
v Investigating
individual differences how people are unique.
v Investigating
human nature how people are a like.
“Personality” can be
defined as a dynamic and organized set
of characteristic possessed by a person that unique influences his or her
cognitions, emotions, motivations, and behaviors in various situations.
Personality may also
refer to the patterns of Thoughts, feelings and behaviours consistently
exhibited by an individual over time that strongly influence our expectations,
self-perceptions, values and attitudes and predicts our reactions to people
problems and stress.
Personality
:
The
world personality comes from the latin root persona, meaning “mark” according
to this root personality is the impression we make on others the mask we
present to the world.
Definition
“A
unique set of traits and characteristics relatively stable over time”
Clearly
personality is unique insofar as each of us has our own personality different
from any other person’s.
Warran
and Cormichael, 1930
Personality
is the entire mental organization of a human being at any stage of his
development. It embraces every phase of human character. intellect,
temperament, skill, morality and every attitude that has been built upin the
course of one’s life.
Hall
and Lindzey
Personality
is the essence of a human being Mayer 2005
“An
individual’s pattern of psychological processes arising from motives, feelings,
thoughts and other major areas of psychological function, personality is
expressed through its influences on the body, in conscious mental life, and
through the individual’s social behavior carl Gustav Sung, 1934.
Personality
is the supreme realization of the innate idiosyncrasy of a living being. It is
an act of high courage flung in the face of life the absolute affirmation of
all that constitutes the individual, the most successful adaptation to the
universal condition of existence coupled
with the greatest possible freedom for self determination.
G.W.
Allport 1961
Personality
is a dynamic organization, inside the person of psychophysical systems that
create the person’s characteristic patterns of behavior, thoughts and feelings
child 1968.
More
or less stable, internal factors make
one person’s behavior consistent from one time to another and different from
the behavior other people would manifest in comparable situations.
Both
these definitions emphasize that personality is an internal process that guides
behavior Gordon Allport (1961) makes the point guides personality is
psychophysical, which means both
physical and psychological, Recent research has shown that biological
and genetic phenomena do have an impact on personality child(1968) makes the
point that personality is stable. Or at least relatively stable. We do not
change dramatically from week to week, tively stable, we do not change
dramatically from week to week, we can predict how our friends will behave, and
we expect them to behave in a recognizably similar way from one day to the
next.
Child
(1968) includes consistency (within an individual) and difference (between
individuals) in his definition and Allport (1961) refers to characteristic
patterns of behavior with in an individual these are also important
considerations so personality is what makes our actions thoughts and feelings
consistent (or relatively consistent) and it is also what makes us different
from one another.
THE
ORIGINS OF PERSOALITY
Heredity
Culture
Family Background
Our experiences through life
Add the people we interact with
THEORY
Five relatively recent sources of
influence upon personality theory.
v Psychoanalytic
theories – Freud and Beyond
v Humanistic
theories – Individuality
v Trait
Theories – Aspects of Personality
v Biological
and Genetic Theories – the way we are made
v Social
– Cognitive Theories – Interpreting the World
Psychoanalytic Theories
– Fred and Beyond
By
the early years of the twentieth century, Sigmund Freud (1856-1939) had begun
to write about psychoanalysis which he described as a theory of the mind or
personality a method of investigation of unconscious process and method of
treatment (1923/62) central to a psychoanalytic approach is the concept of
unconscious mental processes the idea that unconscious motivations and needs
have a role in determining our behavior
this approach also emphasizes the irrational aspects of human behavior
and postrays aggres sive and sexual needs as having a major impact on
personality.
Unconscious
mental processes processes in the maind that people are not normally aware of
Humanistic
Theories – Individuality
Humanistic,
or phenomenological, theories of personality present a positive and optimistic view
of human behavior.
In
complete contrast to theories from the psychodynamic tradition, people are
viewed as experiencing beings rather than victims of their unconscious
motivations and conflicts so the emphasis here is on individual experiences
relationships and ways of understanding the world. Fundamental to these
theories are the beliefs that everyone’s experience is unique, and the
individual’s perception of the world is critical to their understanding and behavior Humanitic theories
have farmed the basis of many therapeutic procedures on which moden counseling
techniques are based.
Humanistic
a branch of personality theory that emphasizes the capacity for personal
growth.
Trait
Theories – Aspects of Personality
Traits
or discripttors used to label personality have their origin in the ways we
describe personality in everyday language.
In
the early years of personality theory, many theorists used the term types of
describe differences between people, Sheldon (1954), for example, categorized people
according to three body types and related these physical differences to
differences in personality endomorphic body types are plump and round with a
tendency to be relaved and outgoing mesomorphic physique and strong and
muscular and usually energetic and
assertive in personality Ectomorphic body types are tall and thin and tend to
have a fearful and restrained personality.
Traits
labels given to consistent and on during aspects of personality, viewed as
continuous dimensions
Biological
and Genetic Theories – the Way we are made
Inhibition
and Arousal
In
1967 Eysenk developed inhibition theory. He argued that individual differences
in eatsavension introversion are strongly determined by heredity and have
their origins in the central nervous system.
According to this theory information from the environment is transmitted from
the sense organs along neural pathways to the brain where excitatory and
inhibitory contical processes result in either the facilitation or inhibition
of behavioural and cognitive responses in certain specific ways.
Egsenck
maintained that extraverts have relatively strong inhibitory processor and weak
excitatory processes their ‘strong’ nervous system enables them to tolerate a
high degree of stimulation the brains slower and weaker reaction to stimuli
creates a hunger or desire for strong sensory stimulation so extraverts seek
excitement from the environment.
Introverts,
on the other hand, have strong excitary processes and weak inhibitory process.
Their nervous systems are ‘weak’ but they have brains that react more quickly
and strongly to stimuli. So they can tolerate only relatively small amounts of
stimulation.
Social
– Cognitive Theories – Interpreting the world
How
do cognitive and social processes affect behavior? And how do different
processing strategies result in differing personalities?
Types
of cognitive affective units in the personality system cognitive affective
units in the personality system Encodings units or constructs for categorizing
events, people and the self.
Expectancies and
beliefst – relating to the social world and about outcomes for behavior, self
afficacy affects – feelings, emotions and affective responses to stimuli.
Goals and values: Desirable and aversive
affective states and outcomes, life goals, values.
Competencies and self regulatory plants:
Behaviours and strategies for organizing actions and influencing outcomes one’s
own behavior and reactions.
Mischel
helps as to answer these questions in 1973 he proposed a set of psychological
person variables for analyzing individual differences in cognitive terms these
variables are assumed to interact with each other as we interpret the social world and act on it. After a number of
developments and refinements, Mischel and Shoda (1995) renamed the variables as
cognitive – affective units in the personality system, integrating constructs
from research in cognition and social learning.
This
model provides a classification system of brood cognitive categories, which
describe interacting processes that may lead to personality differences, we
will explore social congnitive theories by taking one category at a time.
CONCLUSION :
It has examine
different theortical explanations of why we show consistency in our behavior,
thoughts and actions and why these consistencies make us different from each
other.
Psychoanalytic
theorists focus on unconscious process and the impact of early childhood
experience, in contrast, humanistic
theorists emphasize human experience and positive aspects of behavior, Trait theorists have
been concerned with the labeling and measurement of personality dimensions,
based on assumptions of stable genetic and biological explanations for
personality, the complex way in which genes and environment determine personality
has presented an important puzzle for personality theory, social cognitive
theories provide on explanation for differences in personality in terms of the
ways we process information and perceive our social world.
Within psychology the
complexities of now our personality develops and determines our behavior have
resulted in a number of differing theoretical perspectives and debates.
These debates about interactions between
genes and environment. Biology and experiences the person and the situation
will continue to engage psychologists in the twenty first century.
References:
Hall. C.S. & Lindzey, G. (1957)
Theories of personality carves, C.S. & Scheies. M.F. (2000) perspectives on
personality Burges S.M. (1993) Personality.
Schultz’s & Schultz, S.E (1994)
Theories of Personality.
No comments:
Post a Comment