Abraham
Maslow
1908-1970
Abraham Harold Maslow
was born April 1, 1908 in Brooklyn, New York. He was the first of seven
children barn to his parents, who themselves were uneblucated Jewish immigrants
from Russia. His parents, hoping for the best for academic success. Not
surprisingly he became very lonely as a boy and found his refuge in books.
To satisfy his parents,
he first studied law at the city college of New York (CCNY).After three
semesters, he transferred to Cornell, and then back to CCNY. He married Bertha
Goodman, his first cousin, against his parents wishes, Abe and Bertha went on
to have two daughters.
He and Bertha moved to
Wisconsin so that he could attend the university of Wisconsin. Here, he become
interested in psychology, and his school work began to improve dramatically. He
spent time there working with Marry Karlow, who is famous for his experiments
with body rhesus monkeys and attachment behavior.
He received his BA in
1930, his MA in 1931, and his Ph.D in 1934 all in Psychology, all from the
university of Wisconsin. A year after graduation, he returned to New York to
work with E.L. Tharndike at Columbia, where Maslow became interested in
research on human sexuality.
He began teaching full
time at Brooklyn college. During this period of his life, he came into contact
with the many European intellectuals that were immigrating to the US and
Brooklyn in particular, at that time people like Adler, Fromm, Horney, as well
as several Gestalt and Freudian Psychologists.
Maslow served as the
chair of the psychology department at Brandeis from 1951 to 1969, while there
he met kurt Goldstein, who had originated the idea of self actualization in his
famous book, The organism 91934). It was also here that he began his crusade
for a humanistic psychology something ultimately much more important to him
than his own theorizing.
He spend his final
years in semi retirement in California, until, on June 8, 1970. He died of a
heart attack after years of ill health.
Theory
One
of the many interesting things Maslow noticed while he worked with monkeys
early in his career, was that some needs take precedence over others. For
example, if you are hungry and thirsty, you will tend to try to take care of
the thirst first. After all, you can do without food for weeks, but you can
only do without water for a couple of days thirst is a “stronger” need than
hunger. Likewise, if you are very thirsty. But someone has put a choke hold on
you and you can’t breath, which is more important ? the need to breathe, of
course on the other hand, sex is less powerful than any of these. Let’s face
it, you won’t die if you don’t get it ! Maslow took this idea and created his
now famous.
Hierarchy
of needs beyond the details of air, water, food and sex, he laid out five
broader buyers, the physiological needs. The needs for safety and security, the
needs for love and belonging, the needs for esteem and the need to actualize the self in that order.
1.
The Physiological needs:
These
include the needs we have for oxygen, water, protein, salt, sugar, calcium and
other minerals and vitamins. They also include the need to maintain a pH
balance (getting too acidic or base will kill you) and temperature (98.6 or
near to it). Also, there’s the needs to be active, to rest, to sleep, to get
rid of wastes (CO2, Sweat, Urine, and feces), to avoid pain and to
have sex. Quite a collection !
Maslow believed and
research supports him, that these are in fact individual needs and that a lack
of say vitamin C, will lead to a very specific hunger for things which have in
the past provided that vitamin C e.g. orange juice, I guess the cravings that
some pregnant women have, and the way in which babies eat the most foul tasting
baby food, support the idea anecdotally.
2.
The safety and security needs :
When
the physiological needs are largely taken care of this second layer of needs
comes into play .you will become increasingly interested in finding safe
circumstances, stability, protection you might develop a need for structure for
order some limits.
Looking
at it negatively, you become concerned, not
with needs like hunger and thirst, but with your fears and anxieties. In
the ordinary American adult, this set of needs manifest themselves in the form
of our urges to have a home in a safe neighbourhood, a little job security and
a nest egg, a good retirement plan and a bit of insurance, and so on.
3.
The love and belonging needs:
Whom
physiological needs and safety needs are, y and large, taken care of, a third
layer starts to show up. You begin to feel the need for friends, a sweetheart,
children, affectionate relationships in general, even a sense of community
looked at negatively, you become increasing susceptible to loneliness and
social anxieties. In our day-to-day life, we exhibit these needs in our desires
to marry, have a family, be a part of a community, a member of a church, a
brother in the fraternity, a part of a gang or a bowling club. It is also a
part of what we look for in a career.
4. The esteem needs:
Next
we begin to look for a little self esteem Maslow noted two versions of esteem
needs. A lower one and a higher one. The lower are it the need for the respect
of others the need for states, fame glasy, recognition, attention, reputation,
appreciation, dignity, even dominance. The higher farm involves the need for
self respect, including such feelings as confidence, competence, achievement mastery, independence, and freedom.
Note that this is the “higher” form because, unlike the respect of others, once
you have self-respect, it’s a log harder to lose !
The
negative version of these needs is low self esteem and inferiority complexes.
Maslow felt that Adler was really onto something when he proposed that these were at the toots of many. If not most, of
our psychological problems. In modern countries, most of us have what we need
in regard to our physiological and safety needs we, more often than not, have
quite a bit of love and belonging too. It’s a little respect that often seems
so very hard to get !
An of the preceding
four levels he calls deficit needs or D- needs. If you don’t have enough of
something i.e. you have a deficit you
feel the need. But if you get all you need, you feel nothing at all ! in other
words, they cease to be motivating. As the old blues song goes, “you don’t miss
your water till your well runs dry!”.
He also talks about
these levels in terms of homeostasis. Homeostasis is the principle by whi9ch
your furnace thermostat operates; when it gets too cold, it switches the heat
on; when it gets too hot. It switches the heat off. In the same way, your body,
when it lacks a certain substance, develops a hunger for it; when it gets
enough of it, then the hunger stops. Maslow simply extends the homeostatic
principle to needs such as safety, belonging and esteem that we don’t
ordinarily think of in these terms.
Maslow sees all these
needs as essentially survival needs. Even love and esteem are needed for the
maintenance of health. He says we all have these needs built in to us
genetically, like instincts, in fact, he calls them instinct like needs.
In terms of overall
development, we more through these levels a bit like stages. As newborns, our
focus if not our entire set of needs is
on the physiological, soon, we begin to recognize that we need to be safe. Soon
after that, we crave attention and affection. A bit later we look for self
esteem, mind you this is in the first couple of years !
Under stressful
conditions, or when survival is threatened, we can “regress” to a lower need level. When you great career falk flat,
you might seek out a little attention. When your family ups and leaves you, it
seems that love is again all you ever wanted. When you face chapter eleven
after a long and happy life, you suddenly can’t think of anything except money.
These things can occur
on a society-wide basis as well. When society suddenly flounders, people start
clamoring for a strong leader to take
over and make things right, when the
bombs start falling, they look for safety. When the food stops coming into the
stores, their needs become even more basic.
Maslow suggested that
we can ask people for their “philosophy of the future” what would their ideal
life or world be like and get significant information as to what needs they do
or do not have covered.
If you have significant
problems along your development a period of extreme insecurity or hunger as a
child, or the loss of a family member through death or devorce, or significant
neglect or abuse you may “fixate” on that set of needs for the rest of your
life.
This is Maslow’s
understanding of neurosis, perhaps you went through a war as a kid. Now you
have everything your heart needs yet you
still find yourself obsessing over having enough money and keeping the panory
well stocked or perhaps your parent divorced when you were young now you have a
wonderful spouse yet you get insanely jealous or worry constantly that they are
going to leave you because you are not “good enough” for them you get the
picture.
Self actualization
The
last level is a bit different Maslow has used a variety of terms to refer to
this level; he has called it growth
motivation (in contrast to deficit motivation), being needs (or B-needs,
in contrast to D-needs), and self – actualization.
These
are needs that o not involved balance or homeostasis. Once engaged, they
continue to be felt. In fact, they are likely to become stronger as we “feed”
them ! They involve the continuous desire to fulfill potentials, to “be all
that you can be”. They are a matter of becoming the most complete, the fullest,
“you” hence the term, self actualization.
Now,
in keeping with his they up to this point, if you want to be truly self
actualizing, you need to have your lower needs taken care of, at least to a
considerable extent. This makes sense; if you are hungry, you are scrambling to
get food; if you are unsafe, you have to be continuously on guard; if you are
isolated and unloved, you have to satisfy that need, if you have a low sense of
self esteem, you have to be defensive or compensate,. When lower needs are
unmet, you can’t fully devote yourself to fulfilling your potentials.
It
isn’t surprising, then, the world being as difficult as it is, that only a
small percentage of the world’s population is truly, predominantly, self
actualizing Maslow at one point suggested only about two percent !.
The
question becomes, of course, what exactly does Maslow mean by self
actualization. To answer that, we need to look at the kind of people he called
self actualizes. Fortunately, he did this for us, using a qualitative method called
biographical analysis.
He
began by picking out a group of people, some historical figures, some people he
knew, whom he felt clearly met the standard of self actualization included in
this august group were Abraham Lincoln. Thomas Jefferson, Albert Einstein,
Eleanor Roosevelt, Jame Adams, William James, Albert Schweitzer Benedict
Spinoza and Alduous Huxley, Plus 12 innamed people who were alive at the time
Maslow di his research. He then looked at their biographies, writings, the acts
and wards of those he knew peroally, and so on. From these sources, he
developed a list of qualities that seemed characteristic of these people, as
opposed to the great mass of us.
These people were
reality centered, which means they could differentiate what is fake and
dishonest from what is real and genuine. They were problems demanding
solutions, not as personal troubles to be railed at or surrendered to and they
had a different perception of means and ends. They felt that the ends don’t
necessarily justify the means, that the means could be ends themselves, and
that the means the journey…. Was often more important than the ends.
The self actualizers
also had a different way of relating to others. First, they enjoyed solitude,
and were comfortable being alone. and they enjoyed deeper personal relations
with a few close friends and family members, rather than more shallow
relationships with many people.
They enjoyed autonomy,
a relative independence from physical and social needs and they resisted
enculturation, that is, they were not
susceptible to social pressure to be “well adjusted” or to “fit in” they were,
in fact non conformists in the best sense.
They had an unhostile
sense of humor preferring to joke at their own expense, or at the human
condition, and never directing their
humor at others. They had a quality he called acceptance of self and
others, by which he meant that these people would be more likely to take you as
you are than try to change you into what they thought you should be. This same
acceptance applied to their attitudes towards themselves. If some quality of
theirs wasn’t harmful, they let it be, even enjoying it as a personal quick. On
the other hand, they here often strongly motivate to change negative qualities
in themselves that could be changed
along with this comes spontaneity and simplicity. They preferred being
themselves rather than being pretentious or artificial. In fact, for all their
non conformity, he found that they tended to be conventional on the surface,
just where less self actualizing nonconformists tend to be the most dramatic.
Further, they had a
sense of humility and respect towards others something Maslow also called democratic
values meaning that they were open to etimic and individual variety, even
treasuring it. They had a quality Maslow called human kinship or Gemeinsch
aftsgefiihl social interest, compassion, humanity. And this was accompanied by
a strong ethics, which was spiritual but seldom conventionally religious in
nature.
And these people had a
certain freshness of appreciation. An ability to see things, even ordinary
things, with wonder. Among with this comes their ability to be creative,
inventive, and original. And, finally, these people tended to have more peak
experiences than the average person. A peak experience is one that takes you
out of yourself, that makes you feel very tiny, or very large, to some extent
one with life or nature or God. It gives
you a feeling of being a part of the infinite and the eternal. These
experiences tend to leave their mark on
a person, change them for the better, and many people actively seek them out.
They are also called mystical experiences, and are an important part of many
religious and philosophical traditions. Maslow doesn’t think that self
actualizes are perfect, of course, these were several flames or imperfections
he discovered along the way as well. First, they often suffered considerable
anxiety and guilt but realistic anxiety
and guilt, rather than misplaced or neurotic versions. Some of them were
absentminded and overly kind. And finally, some of them had unexpected moments
of ruthlessness, surgical coldness, and loss of humor.
Two other points he
makes about these self actualizes. Their values were “natural” and seemed to
flow effortlessly from their personalities. And they appeared to transcend many
of the dichotomies others accept as being undeniable, such as the differences
between the spiritual and the physical, the selfish and the unselfish, and
the masculine and the feminine.
Conclusion:
Maslow
has been a very inspirational figure in personality theories. In the 1960’s in
particular, people were tired of the reductinistic, mechanistic messages of the
behaviorists and physiological psychologists. They were looking for meaning and
purpose in their lives, even a higher, more mystical meaning Maslow was one of
the pioneers in that movement to bring the human being back into psychology an
the person back into personality.
At
approximately the same time, another movement was gelting underway. One
inspired by some of the very things that turned Maslow off computers and
information processing as well as very rationalistic theorized such as piagets
cognitive development theory and Noam Chomsky’s linguistics. This of course, be
came the congnitive movement in psychology. As the heyday of humanism appeared
to lead to little more than drug abuse. Astrology and self indulgence,
congnitivism provided the scientific ground students of Psychology were
yearning far.
But
the message should not be lost. Psychology is, first and foremost, about
people, real people, in real lives and not about computer models, statistical
analysis, rat behavior, test scores and laboratories.
References:
Copyright
1998, 2006 by Dr. C. Goerge Boere Boldwin A.F. Personal structure of
personality.
No comments:
Post a Comment