Thursday, October 25, 2012

Mental health and depression among slum dwellers





Mental health and depression among slum dwellers
Chandrakant Jamadar
Asst.Professor, P.G.Studies in Psychology, Maharani Arts & Commerce College for womens, J.L.B.Road, Mysore


Abstract
Aim of the Research
The general aim of the present investigation has been to know about mental health and depression of slum dwellers living in slums. Objectives: To assesses and analyses the mental health and depression male and female, to find out the mental health and depression in different age group and to know the mental health and depression among Hindu and Muslim .Result & Discussion: Pearson correlation  is .315reflects the mental health and personal health depression in slum dwellers. It is significant.001 level. Therefore, the hypothesis is accepted and it shows that there is difference in mental health and personal health depression in slum dwellers.

Key words: Mental health, Depression, anxiety, stress and slum


Introduction
Among the basic necessities of life, the housing occupies an important place. Prof. Friedlander points out that ‘Social Welfare is deeply concerned with adequate housing ; next to food and clothing, housing is one of the basic necessities of man, particularly for t he maintenance of family life”.1 However, for quite a large number of people all over the world, housing remains a far distant dream. Analyzing the data pertaining to housing remains a far distant dream. Analyazing the data pertaining to housing in different countries, franchise Cheruniliam observes that although the problem is very chronic in developing countries, most of the advance countries including U.S.A and U.S.S..R. also are not free from the housing problem.2 The acute housing conditions and he poverty are supposed to be the major reasons for the mushroom growth of the slums all over the world.

The phenomenon of slum is worldwide. Almost every city has slums. They are spread from Bombay to Burmuda, and from Manchester to Manila. But some countries deny their existence. The reason behind the non-existence of slums in these countries may be the basic ideology held by these countires. Hence, Rao and Rao stress the need for careful examination of the basic ideology behind the problem of slums. Some scholars (See Rao and Rao, 1984; Desaiand Pilali, 1972; D.G. Epstein 1972 D.G. Epstein 1972) recognize that the problem of slum is associated with the exploitative system of the capitalist society with its exploitative mode of production. To mitigate the problem of slums scholars like Rao and Rao emphasize to bring about a basic change in the exploitative system in the direction of socialistic ideology. Fredrick Engels held a similar view. He says. “As long as the capitalist mode of production continues to exist, it is folly to hope for an isolated solution of the housing question or any other social question affecting the fate of the workers”. The solution according to him, lies in the abolition of the capitalist   mode of production and the appropriation of all the means of life and labor by the working class itself. Thus the positive relationship is sought between the existence of the slums and the exploitative mode of production. In this connection, it may also be noted that Desai and Pillai regret that they do not have comparable data on the shelter problem for the socialist countries.  So they suggest that “The massive urban renewal programmes in these countries, where private ownership of land does not exist, deserves careful study.”

METHODOLOGY

Statement of the problem
“Mental health and depression among slum dwellers” 

Aim of the Research
The general aim of the present investigation has been to know about mental health and depression of slum dwellers living in slums.

Objectives
1.      To assess and analyses the mental health and depression male and female
2.      To find out the mental health and depression in different age group
3.      To know the mental health and depression among Hindu and Muslim

Hypothesis
1.      Male and Female respond before significant in their mental health and depression score
2.      Responded belong different age group before significant different mental health and depression score
3.      Responded belonging to Hindu and Muslim religion significant difference in their mental health and depression score.

Variable
·         Independent variable : Slum dwellers
·         Dependent variable : Mental health and depression

Samples 
The Mysore city has 81 areas properly declared as slums. Out of these 81 slums, two slums have been selected on purposive basis; out of the residents of these slums 100 slum dwellers from each selected area have been selected by using the method of quote samples method 50 Hindu and 50 Muslim slum dwellers.

Tools
Interview schedule with attendant technique has been used as tool of data collection. Technique of interviewing and observation has been used for gathering information. A tool of the present study was carefully prepared and was tested for their mental health and depression, reliability and validity. The method of testing has been of much help in holding such tests

1.      Mental Health Questionnaire by Dr. Jagadish and Dr. A.K, Srivastava 
2.      Personal health Questionnaire depression scale Standford Patient Education Research center (2001)

Mental health analysis having items, different scales. In the present scale 4, alternative responses have been given to each statement i.e always often… 4 scores to ‘Always’ 3 scores ‘often’, 2 scores to ‘Rarely’ and 1 scores to ‘Never’ marked responses as to assigned for true keyed (positive) statement where as 1, 2, 3 and 4 scores for ‘Always’ ‘often’ ‘Rarely’ and ‘Never’ respectively in care of false keyed (Negative) statements. The over lined items are negative while remaining positive. This analysis showing 6 dimensions and 54 items. Reliability is overall .73 and validity of the inventory .54.
Depression analysis having items. If two consecutive numbers are circled, scored the high (more distress) number. If the numbers are not consecutive, do not score the item. Score is the sum of the 9 items. If more than 1 item missing, set the value of the scale to missing. A score of 15 or greater is considered major depression, 20 or more is severe major depression this analysis showing 9 items reliability is .88.

Statistical analysis
According to the plan already prepared uni-variate and multi variate table were drawn variables have been so arranged that definite inference regarding to presence or absence of actual relationship as hypothesized may be drawn. In order to arrive a different conclusions. Statistical method has been applied but greater reliance has been placed on statistical methods. The regar as we use the test-mean, SD, t-test, ANOVA and Pearson correlation.

Result and Discussion.
Table No. 1.Distribution of Respondents According to their Religion in Mental health (N = 100)

Sl. No
Religion
Mean
SD
t-value
1
Muslim
133.94
16.85
-1.325
2
Hindu
138.14
14.73

                       It is not significant


The table shows that their mental health reflects the Muslim and Hindu religion slum dwellers. The mean score of mental health of Muslim and Hindu Religion is 133.94 and 138.14 respectively. Where as the SD is 16.856 and 14.747 respectively. The calculated t-value is -1.326, it is not significant. It shows that there is no difference in mental health of Muslim and Hindu Religion slum dwellers. Therefore the hypothesis is rejected.


Table No. 1. Distribution of Respondents According to their Religion in Personal Health Depression (N = 100)

Sl. No
Religion
Mean
SD
t-value
1
Ph.D Muslim
15.20
4.22
-4.135
2
Hindu
18.04
2.39

*Significant at .000 level


The table shows that their personal health depression in Muslim and Hindu religion slum dwellers. The mean score of personal health depression in Muslim and Hindu Religion slum dwellers is 15.20 and 18.04. Where as the SD is 4.228 and 2.390 respectively. The calculated t-value is -4.135, which significant at .000 level. It shows that there is highly significant difference in the personal health depression in Muslim and Hindus Religion slum dwellers. Therefore the hypothesis shows that there is a significant difference between personal health depression in Muslim and Hindu Religion slum dwellers which is accepted.

Table No3. Distribution of Respondents According to their gender in Mental Health   (N = 100)
Sl. No
Religion
Mean
SD
t-value
1
MH male
139.46
13.35
2.19
2
Female
132.06
17.55
                                *It is significant


The table shows that their mental health reflects the male and female gender slum dweller. The mean score of mental health of male and female is 13.354 and 17.553 respectively. The calculated t-value is 2.193, it is significant. It shows that there is difference in the mental health of male and female slum dwellers. Therefore the hypothesis that there is a significant difference between mental health of male and female slum dwellers which is accepted.
Table No.4.Distribution of Respondents According to their Gender in Personal Health Depression (N = 100)

Sl. No
Religion
Mean
SD
t-value
1
PHD Male
17.54
2.95
2.55
2
Female
15.70
4.15

*It is significant at .012 level


The table shows that their personal health depression in male and female slum dwellers. The mean score of personal health depression in male and female slum dwellers is 17.54 and 2.950. Where as the SD is 2.950 and 4.156 respectively. The calculated t-value is 2.553, which significant at .012 level. It shows that there is significant difference in the personal health depression in male and female slum dwellers. Therefore the hypothesis shows that there is a significant difference between personal health depression in male and female slum dwellers which is accepted. 
Table No. 5. Distribution of Respondents According to their Age group in Mental Health

Sl. No
Age
N
Mean
SD
t-value
1
MH 18.40
52
131.67
15.67
-2.97
2
40+
48
140.77
14.88

*It is significant


The table shows that their mental health reflects the age of 18 years or more in slum dwellers. The mean score of mental health of age group is 131.67 and 140.77 respectively. Where as the SD is 15.675 and 14.881 respectively. The calculated t-value is -2.971, it is significant. It shows that there is significant difference in mental health of age group slum dwellers. Therefore the hypothesis shows that there is significant differences between mental health in age group  slum dwellers which is accepted. 
Table No.6. Distribution of Respondents According to their Age group Personal Health Depression 
Sl. No
Age
N
Mean
SD
t-value
1
PHD 18.40
52
15.83
4.04
-2.27
2
40+
48
17.48
3.10

*Significant at .025 level


The table shows that their personal health depression in age group slum dwellers. The mean score of personal health depression in age group slum dwellers is 15.83 and 17.48. Where as the SD is 4.047 and 3.108 respectively. The calculated t-value is -2.276, which significant at .025 level. It shows that there is y significant difference in the personal health depression in age group slum dwellers. Therefore the hypothesis shows that there is a significant difference between personal health depressions in age group slum dwellers which is accepted. 

Table No. 6. Distribution of Respondents According to their Education in Mental Health


Sl. No
Education
N
Mean
SD
t-value
1
MH Illiterate
61
134.74
16.47
-1.025
2
Literate
39
138.08
14.91

*It is not significant


The table shows that their mental health reflects the illiterate and literate slum dwellers. The mean score of mental health of illiterate and literate is 134.74 and 138.08 respectively. Where as the SD is 164.74 and 14.918 respectively. The calculated t-value is -1.025, it is not significant. It shows that there is no difference is mental health of illiterate and literate slum dwellers. Therefore the hypothesis is rejected.
Table No.7. Distribution of Respondents According to their Age group Personal Health Depression 
Sl. No
Age
N
Mean
SD
t-value
1
PHD Illiterate
61
16.10
3.91
-1.78
2
Literate
39
17.44
3.23

*Significant at .078 level


The table shows that their personal health depression in Illiterate and literate slum dwellers. The mean score of personal health depression in Illiterate and literate slum dwellers is 16.10 and 17.44. Where as the SD is 3.910 and 3.235 respectively. The calculated t-value is -1.781, which significant at .078 level. It shows that there is no significant difference in the personal health depression in illiterate and literate slum dwellers. Therefore the hypothesis is rejected.

Table No. 8.Distribution of Respondents According to their Age group in Mental Health

Sl. No
Age
N
Mean
SD
t-value
1
MH Joint
20
134.80
11.80
-.38
2
Nuclear
80
136.35
16.80



The table shows that their mental health reflects the family in slum dwellers. The mean score of mental health of family (joint and nuclear) is 134.8 and 136.35 respectively. Where as the SD is 11.804 and 16.809 respectively. The calculated t-value is -.388, it is not significant. It shows that there is no difference in mental health of Joint and Nuclear slum dwellers. Therefore the hypothesis is rejected.

Table No.9.Distribution of Respondents According to Family Personal Health Depression 
Sl. No
Age
N
Mean
SD
t-value
1
PHD Joint
20
17.75
2.19
1.536
2
Nuclear
80
16.34
3.9


The table shows that their personal health depression in joint and nuclear family slum dwellers. The mean score of personal health depression in joint and nuclear family slum dwellers is 17.75 and 16.34. Where as the SD is 2.197 and 3.95 respectively. The calculated t-value is 1.536, which significant at .128 level it is not significant. It shows that there is no significant difference in the personal health depression in joint and nuclear family slum dwellers. Therefore the hypothesis is rejected.





Table No. 10.Distribution of Respondents According to their Religion and Gender MH

Sl. No
Religion Gender
Mean
SD
t-value
1
Muslim     Male
                 Female
                 Total
133.40
134.48
133.94
10.75
21.53
16.85
6.897
2
Hindu       Male
                 Female
                 Total
145.52
130.76
138.14
13.11
12.57
14.73
 *It is not significant at 0.01 level




The table shows that their mental health reflects the religion and gender in slum dwellers. The mean score of mental health of religion and gender is Muslim is 133.40 and 134.48 where as the SD is 10.755 and 21.537 respectively. The F-value is 1.940 it is not significant. It shows that there is no difference in mental health of Muslim slum dwellers.

The mean score of mental of religion in Hindu is 145.52 and 130.76. Where as the SD is 13.112 and 12.571 respectively. The F-value is 5.144 it is not significant. It shows that there is no difference in mental health of Hindu slum dwellers. Therefore the hypothesis is rejected.

Table No. 11.Distrubution of Respondents According to their Religion and Gender PHD

Sl. No
Religion Gender
Mean
SD
F-value
1
Muslim     Male
                 Female
                 Total
16.72
13.68
15.20
3.45
4.44
4.22
18.69
7.84
3.33
2
Hindu       Male
                 Female
                 Total
18.36
17.72
18.04
2.09
2.65
2.39

*It is highly significant at 0.00 level.


The table shows the personal health depression in Muslim religion slum dwellers. The mean score of personal health depression in Muslim Religion is 16.72 and 13.68. Where as SD is 3.45 and 4.41 respectively. The F value is 18.698. Which is significant at .000 level. It shows that there is highly significant difference in the personal health depression in Muslim Religion is slum dwellers.

The mean score of personal health depression in Hindu Religion is 18.36 and 17.72 where as SD is 2.099 and 2.654 respectively. The F-value is .006,k which is significant at .006 level. It shows that there is significant difference in the personal health depression in Hindu Religion slum dwellers.
Therefore the hypothesis shows that there is significant difference between personal health depression in religion and gender slum dwellers which is accepted.

 Table No. 12. Distribution of respondents According to their person correlation of MH and PHD (N = 100)

Sl. No
M.H
PHD
1
Pearson correlation
Sig
.315
.001
                               It is significant at .001
The table shows that there the Pearson correlation is .315reflects the mental health and personal health depression in slum dwellers. It is significant.001 level. Therefore, the hypothesis is accepted and it shows that there is difference in mental health and personal health depression in slum dwellers.
Conclusion: The slum dwellers are not fulfilled their basic needs because, they need the employement, food and nutrition then they are getting good mental health and leading the peaceful life.

REFERENCES:
  1. La Pierre: The City of Joy, Paperbabk edition, 1985.
  2. Singh S.D. and K.P. Pothen : The Slum Children of India : Deepand Deep Publications New Delhi, 1982.
  3. Balsara. J.P.: Problems of Rapid Urbanization in India, 1964, p. 158.
  4. Sachchidanand: Social Disorganization among Tribals in Bihar.
  5. M.S.A. Rao: Some Aspects of Sociology of Migration, Sociological Bulletin, Vol. 30, No. 1, March 1981.
  6. Inder Mohan: The Poor of India’s Capital: The Other Side, Oct, 1987, No. 9, page 6.
  7. Soman M.S.: “Urbanization and Rural Migrants”, Abstracts of papers NEHU, Shillong, 1987.
  8. M.L.Singh: “Urbanization and Residential Segregation within Scheduled Caste in Coimbatore”, Abstracts of papers, NEHU Shilling, 1987.
  9. Noor Mohammad: “Urbanization, Slums and Social Conflict: A Study of Slums in Kanpur City”. Abstract of papers, NEHU Shilling, 1987.
  10. D’Souza, Victor: Scheduled Caste and Urbanization in Punjab: An Explanation”, Sociological Bulletin.Vol. 24, No. 1, March, 1975.
  11. Chowdhary N.C.: “Munda Settlement in Lower Bengal: A Study of Tribal Migration” Bulletin of the Cultural Research Institute, 2(2) p. 23-32. 

No comments:

Post a Comment